Taylor Swift’s Jet Flew from the Metro East to Chesterfield — And Back

That’s a lot of expense just to avoid St. Louis drivers

Written by Kallie Cox
04/11/2025
RFT Writers are a collective of independent journalists contributing original reporting to RFT. They report on a wide range of topics including music, news, gaming, cannabis, and the creator economy.

Taylor Swift must know all too well the horrors of driving in St. Louis, because instead of braving city streets, her private jet recently took a 13-minute journey between Cahokia Heights to Chesterfield — twice.

The 28-mile flight went from Chesterfield (almost certainly the Spirit of Saint Louis Airport) to Cahokia Heights (almost certainly the misleadingly named Downtown St. Louis Airport) — and then, later that day, back again.

The trips were first reported by a Taylor Swift Jet tracking account on X (formerly known as Twitter). The account says they occurred on January 30.

The first flight flew from the Spirit of Saint Louis Airport to Cahokia Heights, a flight that took 26 minutes and cost $844 of fuel, according to the tracking account @SwiftJetNextDay. That produced two tons of CO2 emissions.

Later that day, the return flight from Cahokia Heights to Chesterfield took approximately $443 in jet fuel and produced 0.8342 tons of CO2 emissions, according to the tracker.

The internet has been in an uproar about Swift’s jet use and contribution to the production of carbon emissions in the days leading up to last night’s Super Bowl. As a possible result of this backlash, and of social media accounts like the one above tracking her movements, Swift sold one of her jets.

The jet sold for $7 million to Missouri-based car insurance company Car Shield, according to Economic Times.

The Illinois-Missouri flight is one of the last publicly tracked flights on Swift’s jet and it is unclear if she was personally traveling to St. Louis, where part of her extended family originally hails, or if the flights were for maintenance or testing.

Swift has attempted to take legal action against those tracking her jet with publicly available data, but the practice isn’t technically illegal, USA Today reports.

uk-card-body uk-card-default uk-card-small uk-margin-small” role=”presentation”>

Subscribe to Riverfront Times newsletters.

Follow us: Apple NewsGoogle News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Or sign up for our RSS Feed

 

 

Why Trust RFT.com

We maintain a strict editorial policy dedicated to factual accuracy, relevance, and impartiality. Our content is written and edited by top industry professionals with first-hand experience. The content undergoes thorough review by experienced editors to guarantee and adherence to the highest standards of reporting and publishing.
Disclosure

Featured Stories

Copyright © 2025. River Front Times. All rights reserved.
Newsletter
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Copyright © 2025. River Front Times. All rights reserved.